Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Rheumatology (United Kingdom) ; 61(SUPPL 1):i55, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1868382

ABSTRACT

Background/Aims The aim of this study is to describe demographics features and outcomes of patients with rheumatic diseases diagnosed with COVID- 19 in a single hospital. Methods Patients with rheumatic diseases and COVID-19 were identified via rheumatology outpatient and inpatient hospital admissions between February 2020 and March 2021. Data was collected retrospectively using the electronic medical records system and in-person and telephone consultations. The data was entered into the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance (GRA) Registry. Data collected included age, gender, ethnicity, smoker status, rheumatic disease, co-morbidities, drug history and vaccine status. Patient outcome was recorded as mortality, recovered (including days to recovery) or symptoms persisting over 90 days (>90). Requirement for hospital admission was also recorded. Comparison was made to the published GRA Registry data. Results Forty-three patients were identified;33 Female (77%),10 (23%) male. Median age 52. 22 Caucasian, 12 Black, 3 mixed race, 2 Asian, 2 Hispanic and 5 unknown. Rheumatoid arthritis (14 patients;33%) was the most common disease. Other diagnoses included psoriatic arthritis (6;14%), systemic lupus erythematosus (4: 9%), Sjogrens syndrome (4: 9%) and ankylosing spondylitis (4;9%). The most common disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) was methotrexate (35%) followed by hydroxychloroquine (33%). Eight patients were taking steroids (19%). Factors associated with hospitalisation were older age (57% age ≥ 52 vs 40% < 52), multiple co-morbidities (71% ≥ 2 comorbidities vs 35% < 2 co-morbidities) and black ethnicity (75% black vs 26% of caucasian). These risk factors for morbidity are similar to the UK background population and published COVID-19 GRA data. There was no increased risk of hospitalisation between different DMARDs (53% on methotrexate required admission vs 50% on hydroxychloroquine). 71% of patients on steroids required admission. The overall study cohort had a 49% hospital admission rate. Similar risk factors were identified for persistence of symptoms > 90;27% of black patients vs 5% of caucasian and 24% of patients with > 2 comorbidities vs 10% of patients with < 2 co-morbidities. Age did not follow the same trend as hospitalisation;10% of patients age ≥ 52 vs 20% of patients < 52 had symptoms > 90. 15% on methotrexate had a recovery time > 90 vs 7% on hydroxychloroquine and 14% on steroids. The overall cohort had a 17% rate of patients having symptoms > 90. Mortality rate within the cohort was 5% (2 patients). Conclusion A case-series of 43 patients with rheumatic diseases and COVID-19 was conducted. The risk factors for hospitalisation, mortality and persistence >90 were similar to other studies. Most significantly the findings show a correlation between black ethnicity and increased risk of all mortality, hospitalisation and symptoms > 90. There was no difference in hospitalisation and different DMARDs.

2.
Rheumatology (United Kingdom) ; 60(SUPPL 1):i46-i47, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1266174

ABSTRACT

Background/AimsThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant disruption to outpatientservices, with hospital resources redirected to acute medical andcritical care units. Social distancing measures meant that routine faceto-face outpatient appointments needed to be cancelled or reimagined. Telemedicine offered an attractive solution. Telemedicine usestechnology to increase access to healthcare and has been usedinternationally in remote clinical settings, the National Health Service's'111' as well as in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration(NASA).MethodsThe University Hospital Lewisham Rheumatology Department organised outpatient review of new and follow-up patients via a consultantsupervised registrar telephone clinic 5 days a week during the firstwave of the COVID-19 pandemic. 278 patients had a telephoneconsultation with the registrar over a 3-month period (30 March to 30June 2020): 197 new and 81 follow-up patients.ResultsOf the 197 new patient referrals: 2% required urgent face-to-facereview (new inflammatory arthritis);31% were provided with futureroutine clinic appointments and 44% were discharged: 35 patientswithout the need for any further investigations and 52 patientsfollowing subsequent investigations (e.g. phlebotomy and radiology).Patients were provided with management advice, links to onlineresources and referred to allied health professionals as indicated, e.g.physiotherapy. Patients were effectively discharged following telephone consultation if the history was sufficient to exclude a conditionrequiring secondary care management and if relevant communityinvestigations were negative (including inflammatory markers andimmunology). 62 of the 197 newly referred patients were offered aroutine follow-up appointment. 36 of these patients were reviewed inperson when COVID-19 restrictions eased. Of these 36 patients, 20were subsequently discharged, diagnoses included: chronic pain (5), osteoarthritis (3), mechanical joint pain (6). 11 patients remained forfollow up, diagnoses included: Sjö gren's syndrome (2) and palindromicrheumatism (1). 5 patients did not attend.ConclusionThe strengths of this model were: the ability to continue to provide anoutpatient rheumatology service;provide safe and effective management for new and follow-up patients;provide patient specific advicepertaining to COVID-19 and to support patients and primary careclinicians. The weaknesses of this model were the use of a singlepractitioner. Video consultation was not available when this model wasimplemented, but should add further to subsequent services. Our experience with the tele-rheumatology model suggests that atelephone triage system, coupled with relevant investigations prior toreferral could lead to an effective virtual management strategy withpotential beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. It also has great promisewith regards to managing chronic conditions in clinical remission withvideo or telephone consultations, utilising virtual disease activityscores (ePROMS now available via the BSR) and satellite monitoringof blood tests and urinalysis. As technology continues to advance, weshould explore ways to modernise the outpatient services.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL